disio2010:submission
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision | |||
| disio2010:submission [2009/09/02 08:54] – gdangelo | disio2010:submission [2009/09/02 09:35] (current) – gdangelo | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
| * Please note that the camera-ready version will conform to the same guidelines as the submission for review. | * Please note that the camera-ready version will conform to the same guidelines as the submission for review. | ||
| * Submitted papers must have not been submitted for review or published (partially or completely) elsewhere. Each paper will be peer reviewed, although some early rejected papers may not receive full-length reviews. Normal papers will receive at least three reviews. Papers are accepted based on originality, | * Submitted papers must have not been submitted for review or published (partially or completely) elsewhere. Each paper will be peer reviewed, although some early rejected papers may not receive full-length reviews. Normal papers will receive at least three reviews. Papers are accepted based on originality, | ||
| + | * The papers that are accepted and presented at the conference will appear in CD-ROM proceedings (with ISBN), in the **ACM Digital Library**, and in EU-DL. | ||
| * **At least one author of each accepted paper must register and present work at the conference**. | * **At least one author of each accepted paper must register and present work at the conference**. | ||
disio2010/submission.1251881681.txt.gz · Last modified: 2009/09/02 08:54 by gdangelo