Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- pads:lunes [2011/01/13 20:58] – gdangelo
+++ pads:lunes [2012/11/14 19:08] – gdangelo
@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
 This modular approach permits the easy integration of external software tools. In practice, such integration is based on very simple template files (such as the graphviz dot language) and provides a good level of extensibility. Under the performance and scalability viewpoint, the most demanding points are the protocol simulation and the traces analysis.
-The first one is demanded to the ARTÌS middleware and the GAIA+ framework, such tools are based on the Parallel And Distribute Simulation (PADS) approach and provide a very good level of scalability.
+The first one is demanded to the ARTÌS middleware and the GAIA+ framework, such tools are based on the Parallel And Distribute Simulation (PADS) approach and provide a very good level of scalability. LUNES has been written in such a way to be able to exploit the adaptive re-configuration features provided by GAIA+.
 The second one, that is the traces analysis, has been excluded from the simulation tasks and some specific software tools have been implemented. Also in this case, the design and implementation of such tools has been done in such a way to exploit all the computational resources provided by parallel (multi-processor or multi-core) architectures.
-**The first public version of LUNES will be release in the next weeks**
+**The last version of LUNES can be freely downloaded from the [[pads:download|Download]] page.**
+**For more information on the LUNES design, implementation and performance please see [[http://arxiv.org/abs/1102.0720|DISIO11]] and [[http://arxiv.org/abs/1105.2447|MOSPAS11]] .**
+**For a short guide on the LUNES installation and usage please see the [[pads:lunesinst|LUNES HOWTO]]. **